Leaked charts 'undercut' case to lift Warragamba dam wall: opponents Image

Leaked charts 'undercut' case to lift Warragamba dam wall: opponents

Leaked charts 'undercut' case to lift Warragamba dam wall: opponents

Plans to raise Warragamba Dam to cut flood risks to downstream communities have been challenged after the leaking of charts show a 14-metre lifting of the wall provides moderate benefit during the biggest events.

The charts, compiled for the environmental impact statement being prepared for Infrastructure NSW, show the anticipated billion-dollar project offers partial reduction for the so-called probable maximum flood, or worst-case scenario.

A similar moderate outcome is also shown for a one-in-500-year flood. Such an event is touted by Infrastructure NSW as similar to the 1867 event, the worst since European settlement to hit the Hawkesbury-Nepean valley.

Warragamba Dam, now sitting at about 50 per cent full. The government says lifting the wall by 14m would reduce downstream flood damage.Credit:Wolter Peeters

The biggest benefit of the 14-metre raising of the wall, standing at 142-metres, comes with moderate flooding in the order of one-in-10 year events, according to a person familiar with study.

Opponents say the charts further reduce the case for raising the wall since much of the waters that could inundate the flood plain enter downstream of Warragamba from the Coxs and other rivers.

"It's a surprising result," Jamie Pittock, an associate professor at the Australian National University, said of the leaked charts. "It really undercuts the argument for raising the dam wall."

Thinking a higher wall will eliminate flood risks could "lull governments, businesses and people into thinking they are safe so they are not prepared for the inevitable big one", Professor Pittock said.

A spokeswoman for Stuart Ayres, the Minister for Western Sydney, did not address the leaked charts but said a higher wall would "create a 14-metre flood mitigation zone [that] would reduce average annual flood damages by about 75 per cent”.

“The final decision to raise the wall has not yet been taken and will only take place after financial, environment and cultural assessments have concluded," she said.

'Rampant over-development'

Harry Burkitt, a campaigner with the GIVE A DAM group, said the latest leak showed "how much money the NSW government is prepared to spend in order to help out floodplain developers”.

“It’s now clear that raising the dam wall is not going to protect western Sydney suburbs from extreme floods as the government has claimed for several years," he said, adding that it would be preferable to build high-level evacuation roads and to curb the "rampant over-development of western Sydney floodplains that is currently taking place”.

It is understood the charts do not take into account how climate change will affect the frequency or scale of the biggest floods.

With a warmer atmosphere holding about 7 per cent more moisture per decree of warming, big flood events could worsen even if they occur less often, climate researchers have said.

The charts also do not take into account the possibility that the dam wall raising will be used to increase Sydney's water supply capacity, not just flood impact reduction.

However, the spokeswoman for Minister Ayres ruled out such a move.

“Raising the Warragamba Dam wall is being considered for the purpose of flood mitigation only," she said.

The largest flood on record, according to the government,  saw river levels reach 19.7 metres at Windsor in 1867.

Original published in the Sydney Morning Herald